Some people say that public transport is inconvenience for commuters. To some extent, do you agree or not ?

***

Public transport is the mean of transport which can carry a lot of people on a fixed route with a given schedule. Nowadays, it is becoming more and more popular in our society. Though someone think that this kind of transport is inconvenience for commuters, I strongly disagree with them.

My first argument supporting public transport is that it is cheaper than any kind of personal transport. This fact is very clear because when using public transport, the total cost are divided for many consumers and each of them just have to pay a small fee. For example, if you go from Haiphong to Hanoi by bus, it takes you only 30.000 VND compare with 500.000 VND by taxi.

My second argument is that public transport is good for our traffic. On the one hand, too much personal transports can cause the traffic jam, especially in rush hour. On the other hand, almost traffic accidents are caused by personal transports. In opposite, drivers of public transports are always experienced and well educated sothat you can believe in them. Obviously, noone including commuters want to be late by traffic jams or other traffic problems.

My last argument is that public transport can solve the environmental problems especially in cities. Nobody can deny that dioxide carbon and hundreds poisons caused by too much personal transports can seriuosly harm the air and our health. It is also the reason why lung cancer and other healthy problems are more effective in cities than countrysides.

There is a reason for someone against public transport. They can not manage their time and always miss the train or bus.I can understand their point of view but I can not agree with them.

So, in conclusion, I believe in public transport as the best way of transport for our society.

Travelling is one of the most popular hobby. Now adays it's getting populariety day by day. The given topic is either people like to travel with group or individual.

Abroad is totally unknown place. Men can not share their mission, vision, experience or quaries cause of different language and customs. Travelling with groups or personally, both have arguments to share or merits and demerits.

From my view group travelling is better than in person. The main theme or intention of travelling is to know a diffrent culture, to see new natural landscapes, to gather different taste some thing like that. In this situation an unknown person may miss any thing like any significant historical place or any important events just lack of language. Where in group or with a proffessional guide this mistake will not take place easily. Yes I know group tour have some restriction like time, day etc. But in vast thinking it is not a major issue. If men want to do any thing new they need help from others whereas if some one have personal tour guide there will not have any miss events or miss sites. On the other hand in a group there are many mind so there have many comments or variety of knowldge to share with others. In addition tour guides are well experience and their intention in travel is to help others in travelling.

In my opinion travelling with the groups certainly have many advantages but travellling alone is as joyful. It also depends on the temperament of the individuals.

I would like to get lost in the streets of such a country whose language, culture and ways of living are absolutely alien to me. I will enjoy talking in the language of symbols and signals. I will see ordinary people and the their styles. I would prefer to spend my nights in some cheap place rather than in a luxury hotel. Afterall I have come here to meet the real people and not the artificial one. There is no joy like wandering in the streets especially if it is some foriegn country. Everyone wants to see historical monuments, museums, buildings and parks but I want to see houses, roads, hills and ordinary shops. Ofcourse security is a concern but being an ordinary traveller what danger I have from the people who are as ordinary as I am.

This is absolutely my personal and subjective point of view. I can not deny that people in groups often enjoy more. They can share their expenses and so can see more places, can share jokes or stories or stuff like this. But I am the person who would like to move without any sense of direction. What directions matter if it is a foriegn land. All I need is a ruck sack, some bread and cheese, a camera, a stove, a camp and feet to walk. I imagine of lying on the grass, sleeping along the bank of a river and then start my journey again in some random direction.

Travelling in groups is effective if we concern on our safety. It is very important to put safety as the main priority as we do not know how the countries we are about to go are. Some people may say that this country is safe, and this is not, but it is always not for foreigners. Therefore, being in a group is recommendable.

most importantly, in our journeys, we do not miss any charming events or great places. And I do not agree people say going in a large number of people will spoil the vacation.Not at all. Let us consider, a group of tourists from Japan going to Hong Kong Disneyland. They must be happy playing and visiting places together. I bet, they would say that they enjoy the trip.

It is economic to walk in groups. Hiring a tourist guide, is however advisable. Trips are scheduled properly and independently. To really experience like being a resident of the country, you should try homestay tour. It can be a traditional ones-adoption to local families or modern-like ones-staying in a separate same-type of house. A long homestay makes you experience more being locals, culturally.

So, why being so individualistic? Traveling in groups is the best way to ensure safety!

Going abroad for holidays has been a very popular activity as of today’s society. People feel being away from all the routines and work which always give them lots of stress and headache is helpful to their health and can also bring about the satisfaction of life itself. Some people would choose to spend their vacation abroad guided by the tour company for which they have guides. To me, the best choice would be a solo tour or a friends-tour.

To begin with, a sense of security provided by the tour company would certainly make everything around you looks just alright as it is. Everything is ready and all the activities are smooth and comfortable. For example, passport check-in is made faster, the hotels are booked, the food is chosen and ready… especially guidance is provided for the first time of flight. This is one good reason for that the travelers prefer a group tour.

Despites that mater, you do not need to worry about the sites for your visit the next day or the day after that at all. Most people would spend two or three days just to find the places of their interest for their whole holidays while that time worth spending on either work or daily life instead. With only one stop at the agency’s door, they will make sure to ease your concerns.

Even though that is a good way to set out on a journey one could have, there are times that humans need more freedom for themselves rather than to follow someone else’s paths. One shall find harmony in choosing visiting grounds by themselves and taking part in every single activity along the way through. In addition to this, those people would feel the boss as he or she decides on what they want. Exploring different culture is also of importance to the purposes of some travelers which results in going to some places that the company cannot put on the schedule. For instance, we cannot find the living style or their social culture or value just by going around them and looking at them from distance. It needs some contact and exposure that only you can have a word about it.

To conclude, I agree that traveling in group could ease most of our work and preparation for the trip. Yet, if I ever have to choose, I would say trying that out alone or with some friends, without guides of course, is a much enjoyable experience life can give.